We already have a topic about which movie everyone should go and watch. This one is about a movie you saw and wanted to get your time back

Let me start with the first one that comes to mind: Banlieue 13: Ultimatum. Its a sequel. It has nothing going on except for 2-3 fighting scenes. A totally impossible ending where bunch of building-climbing ppl infiltrate presidents safe place. Watch trailers but not the movie.

liger wrote:


Hehehehe!

Miss Congeniality.

I can't tell you how much this film offends me.

Frosteh knows a little as it's come up in conversation a number of times.

I've seen bad movies, crap movies, poorly scripted movies, poorly acted movies, and in most I've found SOMETHING to be interested in; SOMETHING to make it worthwhile.

I've not even a clue how I came to watch this movie; less of a clue how I sat through it.

I even like Sandra Bullock.

But **** me, this has to be THE worst movie in the world.

I can't bear it.

I find it offensive I even wrote about.

Damn ...

ah from that category i know a movie, its from uwe boll: alone in the dark.

After that movie i was really pissed and felt like I aged from the time waste

Snakes on a plane for me...

It could have been good, it has Samuel L Jackson... its just too bad to be true...

VoGon wrote:


Agreed. That is one appalling film by any standard - how on earth did Samuel read the script and think, 'Hell yeah, I'll do it'.

Have you seen Snakes on a train? And it doesn't even have Samuel in it.

Lets think of some other sequel titles for the makers to really take this franchise to it's grave ......

Snakes down a drain.
Snakes in Spain.
Snakes in ...

DreamState wrote:


I read someone asking him that somewhere, he just said "Well you know actors sometimes also need money" not that I think he is poor, but may be the case here...

"Snakes on the moon"

They go up to space only to find a snake on zero gravity...